翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Federalist No. 62
・ Federalist No. 63
・ Federalist No. 64
・ Federalist No. 65
・ Federalist No. 66
・ Federalist No. 67
・ Federalist No. 68
・ Federalist No. 69
・ Federalist No. 7
・ Federalist No. 70
・ Federalist No. 71
・ Federalist No. 72
・ Federalist No. 73
・ Federalist No. 74
・ Federalist No. 75
Federalist No. 76
・ Federalist No. 77
・ Federalist No. 78
・ Federalist No. 79
・ Federalist No. 8
・ Federalist No. 80
・ Federalist No. 81
・ Federalist No. 82
・ Federalist No. 83
・ Federalist No. 84
・ Federalist No. 85
・ Federalist No. 9
・ Federalist Party
・ Federalist Party (France)
・ Federalist Party (Italy)


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Federalist No. 76 : ウィキペディア英語版
Federalist No. 76

Federalist No. 76 is an essay by Alexander Hamilton and the seventy-sixth of ''The Federalist'' Papers. It was published on April 1, 1788 under the pseudonym Publius, the name under which all ''The Federalist'' Papers were published. The title is, The Appointing Power of the Executive, and is the tenth in a series of 11 essays discussing the powers and limitations of the Executive branch.
== Summary ==
Publius begins this essay by quoting the Appointments Clause of the proposed United States Constitution. Publius then states that "it is not easy to conceive a plan better calculated than this" and explains why he believes that is so. He explains that the power of appointment can only be modified in one of three ways: vested in a single man, in a "select assembly of a moderate number," or in a single man with concurrence by an assembly.
First, he explains that such power vested in a single man would make him sway to personal inclinations and attachments. Thus, this was not the best option. Second, he explains that power vested in an assembly would make the group prone to compromise, where one's personal inclination for one appointment would lead him to compromise on another in the hope that others will do the same for his. Again, this would not work very well.
The only possible option left was to place the Appointment power with the President, by and with the consent of the Senate. According to Publius, this arrangement would ensure that the nominated candidate's qualifications were taken into account by the Senate and fully considered before the appointment was completed.
Publius concludes by explaining that the Constitution was written to provide important safeguards to ensure against tyranny.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Federalist No. 76」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.